I believed more could be worked by OSRS on content
For example like building NPC home or RuneScape gold a nearby bridge, a larger project could take 6-8 hours to finish granting experience speeds that are reasonable during, and the town could cover all the source cost. You might get paid a reasonable amount for the work also, but not a great thing. Maybe you could receive perks or rewards for selecting contracts in place of payment. The principal focus would need to be making it an adoptable training system for those working to a top building level, while still being rewarding to those who have 99 construction and beyond.
I'd appreciate a finish comments box (although I know if that's hard to undergo ). I could not say I believed more could be worked by OSRS on content that is completionist. This was especially glaring on the"what would you think OSRS should concentrate on?" Section, where I needed to select stuff that I like, but not really what I believed the dev group should focus on. Glad to see they are looking in to it. I used the improvement on in-game box towards the limit not straight in-game related for fear. There wasn't so that was probably a fantastic call. They could have used more enter areas because there was a lot I'd have mentioned but wasn't provided a place to.
Yes, I completely second this. At every opportunity, I tried to slide in more"untradeable/completionist articles", but the replies just couldn't reflect it completely. I would have enjoyed a general remarks box in the end because there were several things I wanted to react to in more detail however had no place to do so. While completionist content would not make it. I'm pretty bummed out the completionist community could not express their opinions for sport direction. I was also glad to see the HD OSRS screenshots. I ranked them as my top, because. It'd make me even more excited to log in and get immersed.
I understand but my experience let us me think it's fine, if you don't feel comfortable using Qualtrics. So let's say I replied this survey 100% honestly, who would you envision gets that info? After GDPR I have felt so pressured by every single site ever to monitor and monitor me it is disgusting, and even more disgusting that it was all happening before without my understanding. Looking at the survey link along with the basic disclosures at the bottom of the webpage it doesn't appear the Jagex is using a third party fielding company so if the only men and women who would have immediate access to your advice are the survey developers who can pull exports out of the database to disperse internally. EU also has some fairly strong data privacy legislation which (at least my US based company which often interacts with Qualtrics links) are followed pretty strictly by the survey developers and data hosting websites.
After running during the survey Jagex definitely appears to be operating solo on this one. No third party company would allow participants directly enter inside their own contact information (since it would mean they'd lose your business for their customer [so not a nefarious thing]) and also the only area I found kinda strange was the telephone number request in the conclusion. I'd have substituted that using a check box for recontacting and then pipe-in the email that you could optionally have put in earlier for confirmation. I think you are fine answering this survey if you have privacy issues since basically all information is anonymous and it's using an industry-standard platform of Qualtrics. Jagex probably doesn't have market study ISO certificates but hey this is a quick yearly survey so they wouldn't need to rs 2007 gold have any.
- Aug 25, 2020
- 10 views